14

Al-Gaffaar
Ġaffār
The Forgiver, The Forgiving
-----------
Really as Bawa Muhaiyaddeen1 said, there is a universe behind each beautiful name of Allah. Ġaffār must be considered in relation to ġāfir, ġafūr, ġaffār. Of the three qualitative ġāfir, ġafūr and ġaffār, ġafūr is present 91 times in the Koran (72 times in association with rahīm). Ġaffār is present five times and ġāfir only once in the expression ġāfir ad-danb (Koran 40,3)2. It is usually accepted among commentators that these three terms only differ in intensity such as for Baġdādi3 and later on Qušayri3, for whom ġafūr is stronger than ġāfir, and ġaffār is stronger still.
For Abū Hātim3, ġāfir ad-danb (Koran 40,3), is used when a lone sin is forgiven. Ġafūr qualify the one who forgive sins usually. Ġaffār is for the one who does not stop from forgiving, one sin after another (danban ba‛d danbin), the gemination of the second letter meaning the repetition and multiplication.
For Ar-Râzî 4, The activity of Very-Forgiving (ghafűr) is larger than the one of forgiver (ghâfir), because the first name is built in an intensive form. In the same way, the function of the “One Who does not stop from forgiving” (ghaffâr) is stronger than that of the Very Forgiving because ghaffâr is a name, of frequentative form, that can be understood as “The One Who forgive sin after sin forever”
Her are some of the verses found in the Holy Koran2:
20:82 “And
surely I am Forgiving toward him who repents and believes and does good, then
walks aright.”
38:66 “The Lord of the heavens and
the earth and what is between them, the Mighty, the Forgiving.”
39:5 “Now surely He is the Mighty,
the Forgiver.”
40:42 “You call me to disbelieve in
Allah and to associate with Him that of which I have no knowledge, and I call you
to the Mighty, the Forgiving.”
58:2 “And surely Allah is
Pardoning, Forgiving.”
71:10 “So I have said: Ask
forgiveness of your Lord; surely He is ever Forgiving:”
From a philologist perspective, the commentary is always the same. Ġafr, meant initially the fact of covering or concealing (satr, taġtiya). From that comes the name miġfar for the headgear armor (ġunnat ar-ra’s) because it ‘covers’ the head, or also, the one of ġafar by which the hair on a cloth such as made of wool or silk is designated because it ‘recovers’ and so hide and conceal the weft. Ar-Râzî 4 also mentioned that in the common usage ghafr means the action of covering (sitr). But Ar-Râzî 4 differs about the interpretation of the meaning of the word ġaffār saying that: “Many are saying that the forgiveness (maġfira) of Allah towards his faithful means that He recovers their sins, that He hide them and does not allow them to show, does not point them out to them and furthermore does not show them to others”.
Ġafara would mean, to ‘keep hidden’, and not to ‘erase’ in the sense of ‘afā from which comes ‘afuww. In terms of sins, God would be qualified as ġafūr or ġaffār because He keeps them hidden, He does not reveal them to the creatures. Halīmī defines al-ġaffār: “ The one who is assiduous to keep hidden, and so, who does not reveal the sin (lā yašharu d-danb) in this world or in the hereafter”.
Ar-Râzî3 contested this way of looking at
it. If the maġfira consisted to hid sins, so that even their makers would
not know, and so others, in that case it was not applied to Adam, Moďse, David,
etc… Because God made public the fall of Adam, his disobedience in saying in
Koran 2,36 :”fa-azallahumā š-šaytānu”
and in Koran 20, 121:”wa ‘asā Ādaabbahu”.
Adam and Eve confessed their fault (v 7,23: zalamnā
anfusanā), that did not stop them to beg for the divine maġfira (the same verse says just
after that wa in lam taġfir lanā),
proof that there is contradiction between ġafara
and azhara. The same apply for
Moise v.28, 16 : rabbi innī zalamtu
nafsī fa-ġfir lī.
Ar-Râzî 4 presents
the following argument: “However, Allah did
point out Adam’s fall (zalla, the
slip) in this verse (Koran 2, 36): “But the devil made them slip from it, and
caused them to depart from the state in which they were.” And (Koran 20, 121):
“And Adam disobeyed his Lord, and was disappointed.” Allah mentioned such text
in the Torah, the Scriptures, the Psalter and the Koran in numerous places. If
forgiveness meant to recover or the occultation (sitr), the deviation (zalla)
of Adam (Peace be upon him) could not have been forgiven. Or Adam, our father,
said (Koran 7, 23) “Our Lord, we have wronged ourselves; and if Thou forgive us
not, and have (not) mercy on us, we shall certainly be of the losers.” Even
that he recognized this deviation, he asked for forgiveness. So forgiveness
cannot be understood as recovering the sin. Another example with Moďse who
recognized the sin and ask for forgiveness (Koran 28, 16): “My Lord, surely I
have done harm to myself, so do Thou protect me; so He protected him. Surely He
is the Forgiving, the Merciful.” Allah showed David’s sin and said (Koran 38,
25) “So We gave him this protection..” Also for Mohamed (Koran 49, 3) “Afin qu’Allah te pardonne ton péché passé et
ŕ venir.” (For Allah to forgive your past and future sins). So
Allah mentioned the sin and added that He forgave him. It is obvious that the
term forgiving (maġfira) cannot
have the meaning of recovering or occultation (sitr). Allah forgiveness can be understood as to efface the excess (‘afw) or diversion (çafh) but only by metaphor because what
is recovered and what disappear are both in need of the absence of
manifestation. Or the participation at an imperfection is one of the reasons
that determine the transgression (tajâwuz),
and to erase the excess allude at the cessation of the punishment attached to
it and implies the renunciation of it. For these reasons, we feel that the Name
of Forgiver (ghâfir) is a divine
Quality of action. This name express the renunciation of action and not its
opposite.”
Ar-Râzî 4 mentions also that: “Those who say that the word “maġfira” is inclusive of the meaning of sitr, to conceal, use the following well known expression “O Celui qui manifeste la Beauté et qui recouvre la laideur (yâ man azhhara al-jamîl wa satara al-qabîh)”. They say that this concealment is inclusive of the life in the world and the hereafter.”
In the classic usage, šahara is used for a bad action. Elsewhere, Halīmī uses as opposite of ġafara or satara the word fadaha, that means to humiliate somebody in revealing his bad actions.
Ġazāli understand almost exclusively ġaffār (and ġafūr) in given them the meaning that God has kept the ugly hidden and manifested the beautiful. God keep hidden the bad thoughts of each one in the deepest part of the heart and He keeps our sins secret while He could rightfully reveal them to all.
In truth it is a bad argument3, all commentators understand that ġaffār means to forgive the sins, meaning to leave them unpunished. For ‘Abd al-Ğabbār, ġafūr and ġaffār mean that God does not execute the punishment while the sin that deserved it was perpetrated.
It might be useful to look at the point of view of the Sufis regarding forgiveness that is associated with the importance of repentance and the need to forget that is stronger even that to simply conceal or recover. Forgiveness will be considered under the different aspects of esoteric studies, mental purification, healing, wisdom and karma, and a study on forgiveness itself by Hazrat Inayat Khan.
In the commentary on Sangatha
SALUK: MORALS Series 2 of Pir-o-Murshid Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid
Samuel L. Lewis, Hazrat Inayat Khan emphasizes the importance of tolerance
first (Tassawuf represents Samuel Lewis and Gatha represents Hazrat Inayat Khan13:
“TASSAWUF: This is discussed in ‘Moral Culture”
and elsewhere. One does not keep evil away by fighting it. This can make the
lines of the evil still more intensely engraved in the mind. Then there are
thought forms and they take nourishment from any attention paid to them, and
lose vitality as they are deprived of psychic consideration. This is also
taught in the lessons on “Forgiveness.”
GATHA:
In order to learn forgiveness man must learn tolerance first. And there are
people whom man cannot forgive. It is not that he must not forgive, and in that
case the first thing he can do is to forget. The first step towards forgiveness
is to forget.
TASSAWUF:
This teaching is presented in the Gathas on Metaphysics. Gayan says:
“Forgiveness belongs to God; it becomes the privilege of mortal man only when
asked by another.” But many assume that they can and do forgive, and yet they
do not always forget. A sore spot remains. This is not forgiveness.
If
we were to study the Jewish Esotericism which is called Kabballah, it is not
always verbal. In the higher stages it is not verbal at all. We have to learn
the words, then the teachings implied by the words. Then we must absorb. It is
not easy to absorb. Therefore there is the science of Ryazat, esotericism. Now
we learn to use our bodies, minds and hearts in everything; not philosophically
but actually. We learn the sciences of the psychic world and beyond. We
practice them. We pray with the body, mind and heart and we do with the body,
mind and heart. Therefore the disciple learns to move his body or a portion of
it with the intent of absorbing psychic-currents and then heart currents. As he
advances in this he makes the accommodation. And as the heart-circle widens,
man consciously or unconsciously makes himself the Khalif of God on earth and
the Sifat-i-Allah are reflected in him. Then forgiveness becomes natural.”
In the “Bowl of Saki14,” Feb. 18, we read: “He who expects to change the world will be disappointed, he must change his view. When this is done, then tolerance will come, forgiveness will come, and there will be nothing he cannot hear.” It also says (March 24) “The first sign of the realization of truth is tolerance.” And Sept. 11, “In order to learn forgiveness, man must first learn tolerance.”
In the Bestowal of Blessings,
Samuel Lewis says: “For that and other reasons
the wise do not retain harsh feeling and try to exhibit compassion. It is not
man’s place to forgive until there is repentance and after that he should never
fail to forgive. If one only knew the value of repentance, how important it is.
Forgiveness is of God and man can only grant it, the Sufis say, when it is
asked of him. Even the good people must pass the gate of Tauba (repentance) to
enter the spiritual path, to travel the way of the heart.”
The Sufi’s constant attitude towards others is that of love and forgiveness9. We read in the Bible, “God is love.” What does love mean? Love means forgiveness, love does not mean judging9. Hazrat Inayat Khan adds in the Gathekas for candidates9:
In
the same way, forgiveness, where there is love, is not a very difficult
thing. A child comes before his mother, having offended her a thousand times,
and asks her forgiveness. There is no other to go to. It does not take a moment
for the heart of the mother to forgive. Forgiveness was waiting there to be
manifested. One cannot help being kind when there is feeling. A person whose
feeling goes out to another strikes a note of sympathy in every person; the
person finds the point of contact in every soul they meet, because they have
love. There are people who say, “But is it not unwise to give oneself in
outgoing tenderness to everyone, because people are not trustworthy?” I should
say, “If a person is good and kind, this goodness ought to be manifested to
everyone, the doors of the heart should not be closed.”
In this study on concentration in
the Githas, Hazrat Inayat Khan said: “Prayer is
a concentration and fear is a concentration, and as prayer brings things that
are desired by the prayerful, so fear brings things that are feared, and in
both cases mastery is absent.In the first case there is weakness owing to
dependence upon another, and the other case, still greater weakness that makes
one fear. Mastery lies in creative concentration of mind. The mind impressed by
one’s faults and by one’s weaknesses becomes feeble and meets failures, and
cannot hold a desired thought with hope and trust. In that case prayer alone
comes to his rescue, when he thinks,” I am wicked and weak, but Thou art
forgiving and almighty, my Lord. I have no power to accomplish my desire, but
Thou are most powerful.” In this way one can keep alive the flame of trust and hope,
in spite of one’s faults and weaknesses. Sometimes one can, and sometimes one cannot.
One cannot when one ’s mind is too much impressed by one ’s weakness and faults,
and when one thinks,” It is impossible that I shall be forgiven,” and when one thinks,”
God is too far away to listen to my prayers. I, the sinner, am living in the
wicked world, and God, the Holy of Holies, is in Heaven.”
Also in the commentary on Mental Purification17, Gatheka is Hazrat Inayat Khan and Tassawuf is Samuel Lewis:
GATHEKA:
This also explains the attitude of Christ. When a criminal was taken to him he
had no other attitude towards him than that of the forgiver. He saw no evil
there. That is looking from a higher reason. And if we penetrate the thousand
veils of reason we can touch the reason of all reasons, and we can come to an
understanding that the other reasons can not give. And by that we understand
all beings; those who are in the right and those who are in the wrong.
TASSAWUF:
Many talk and even talk glibly about different stages of consciousness. Yes,
there are many stages of consciousness, but they are certainly not variations
of the same state of consciousness which each person may have. Transcendency
involves change of outlook and increased dimensionality of vision. But when
increased dimensionality becomes a mere thought form it has no value at all, it
is just a noise. That is why many see no great changes in religious people who
claim spiritual rebirth without a radical change in functions and outlook.
In the commentary on Insight11,
Samuel Lewis addresses the issue of health and healing through forgiveness and
forgetting: “TASSAWUF11: There are
several ways in which the heart tells of the past. One is the direct method of
reconnaissance, or of what French calls raconteuring. Some people like to talk
about their pasts and their habit sometimes helps them to recall more. But the
mystic also believes that the way toward forgiveness and indeed toward hatred
and all evil emotions is by forgetting. When one forgets lines are removed both
from the physical body and the mind. As lines are removed, peacefulness may set
in. As this sort of peacefulness comes in, it is like removing what the Hindus
call samskaras. When samskaras are removed the mind becomes
more easily purified. When mind becomes more easily purified one is protected
or cured of the most vicious diseases.”
In the original Sangatha, Suras on
Breath, Samuel Lewis says19 on God forgiving our short-comings:
In
Genesis III, 8, the Voice of God is associated with the Ruach, the spiritual
breath. This is the great mystery which becomes clear. When the Voice is heard
in the Cosmic HU or in any of the nine subsidiary sounds of Saute Surmad, know
that God is present and the Light is flowing through your being. This is the
first step toward resurrection.
This
light of God in you can pierce every nufs and perceive every thought. When it
is said man is veiled, what veils man? It is his nufs. The etheric element
makes everything indistinct, but this is true only so long as this veil of the
nufs prevents Divine Omniscience from expressing itself. It is the nature of
the soul to see, and it is the nufs which prevents it from seeing.
The
nufs of another does not hinder our sight, only his sight. That is why it is
much easier to overcome the opposition of another than to dominate one’s own
evil thought. The law is this: the nufs of one person can dominate the soul of
that person and can dominate the nufs of another person but can never dominate
the soul of another person.
This
is perceptible from two points of view. The law manifests in the average man in
the analytical faculty. He can see the short-comings of another. Even when
another justifies himself, the other’s heart can see that person’s faults.
Among the sages, especially with the masters, the law presents another aspect,
that is, to one who has overcome his own nufs, the nufs of another offers no
real hindrance in life except where consciously or unconsciously he (not God)
has given them that power.
The
consequence of this law is that overcoming one’s own short-comings (which is
really done by God, Who forgives our short-comings) we are also able to see
more into another person’s nature.
This
makes spiritual healing possible. Health is the normal state but weakness is
the average condition. Fikar is the best preservative of health because thought
of God restrains the nufs. All weakness has some mental correspondence, even
when the cause is not mental, that is to say, even if the disease came for
purely physical reasons. Mind really has power over matter, when the spiritual
light flows therein health should be a normal state. Fikar restrains disease by
purifying the breath and preventing the mind from recording all the earthly
impressions. In that way, even the purely physical disabilities can be
mastered.
In the commentary on the Inner
life15, Hazrat Inayat Khan as “Gatha” and Samuel Lewis as “Tassawuf”
said: “Gatheka: When man pictures God as
Forgiver, he finds that there is not only in this world a strict justice, but
there is love developed also, there is mercy and compassion, there is that
sense of forgiveness; that God is not the servant of law, as is the judge in
this world, He is Master of law. He judges when He judges; when He forgives He
forgives. He has both powers, He has the power to judge and He has the power to
forgive.
Tassawuf:
Sura CX reads: “Celebrate the praises of the Lord, and pray for His forgiveness
for
He
is oft-returning (in Grace and Mercy).” (v.3) The full sense of this comes
when, after constant repetition, one feels the import of the words of prayer.
Gatheka:
He is Judge because He does not close His eyes to anything man does; He knows,
He weighs, and measures, and He returns what is due to man. And He is Forgiver,
because beyond and above His power of justice there is His great power of love
and compassion, which is His very Being, which is His one Nature, and therefore
it is more, and in greater proportion, and working with a greater activity than
His power of justice.
Tassawuf:
This is not always seen by writers and philosophers. They judge from the
externals. They are not wrong but also they do not always go deep. If
everything were like in the physical law of cause and effect, action and
reaction, then there would be no evolution, no progress. Whatever things were,
however they were created, there could be no change. But there is change, there
is advancement. And when we look more deeply we can find the Sifat-i-Allah pushing
themselves, so to speak, through every facet of creation in some way or other.
Gatheka:
We, the human beings in this world, if there is a spark of goodness or kindness
in our hearts, avoid judging people. We prefer forgiving to judging. Forgiving
gives us naturally a greater happiness than taking revenge, unless a man is on
quite a different path.
Tassawuf:
Despite many injunctions from many prophets, man is prone to judge. Looking
outwardly, each sees the injustices of others. But at the same time there is a
protective quality. Man wants to protect his own. Some mothers will go far out
of their way to protect or excuse or defend their children. This shows that in
selfish and unselfish alike there are other factors working than
evenly-laid-out justice. Inveighing against injustice is no good. The just man
becomes strong. The forgiving man becomes stronger and thus becomes the example
to be followed.
Gatheka:
The fourth principle is to love unceasingly all those who deserve love, and to
give to the undeserving their forgiveness; and this is continually practiced by
them.
Tassawuf:
This must be practice, not philosophy. One begins with those close at hand and
radiates the love gradually to all mankind. As one begins to feel the Divine
Presence this becomes easier. It cannot be otherwise.”
In the “Gayaniat16” Samuel Lewis commented on the subject of forgiveness and karma:
“Forgiveness
belongs to God; it becomes the privilege of mortal man only when asked by
another.” For forgiveness means that one avoids the karma of his evil act and
only God can void the karma of it. When there is repentance of heart, the
Divine Grace is offered which purifies all sin. Nevertheless while man cannot
avoid the effect of karma he can void the cause, he can refuse to accept the
evil done him as evil or regard the insult as insult and then when the
wrong-doer asks himself forgiveness, by refusing to recognize the wrong as
wrong he exerts the privilege of forgiveness in that moment, which is the only
time he has that opportunity. Otherwise if he accepts the evil as evil he adds
to the storehouse of evil and aids in the force of Samsara even as the
wrong-doer does.
“No
one can be human and not make a mistake.” The human person is one who still has
limitations which means that he may fail before man or fail before God. No man
is perfect before man or need be, for to be perfect in this sense he would have
to follow humanity and never lead; for to lead humanity one must perhaps do that
which has not been done before, and there is no greater opportunity for making
mistakes than starting in a new direction. But this starting in a new direction
is also a characteristic of initiation, going toward God, and as God is
All-Forgiving and All-Wise He recognizes that man seldom fulfills his purpose
at one bound, so that man may err, but man may be forgiven and offered
opportunities anew.
In this Commentary on Sangatha: “TAKUA TAHARAT: EVERYDAY LIFE10”,
Hazrat Inayat Khan says: “GATHA: As a practice
of purifying one’s heart is to repeat every morning and every evening: “My
thoughtful self! Reproach no one, hold a grudge against no one, bear malice
against no one; be wise, tolerant, considerate, polite and kind to all!” to
which Samuel Lewis comments: “TASSAWUF10:
This practice is called Dowa. In Islam there is a difference between Nimaz, or
prayers in praise of God, and Dowa, beseeching God either for self-protection
or for some attribute or gift, physical or non-physical. There is no doubt that
Mohammed, under Divine impetus, was trying to make prayer something more than a
beseeching for forgiveness of sins or accumulation of worldly possessions.
These have put a limitation on prayer so great that there have been reactions
to it. The ignorant and emotional people have taken away all the beauty of
holiness. They have retained the words. Almost everyone can see there is a far
cry from prayers and their answers and almost all the activities in man where
answers come more or less naturally. This means either that prayer and praying
are of little value, or we are not praying properly. Ignorant devotees do not
conceive of “My thoughtful self.” All Prophets and Messengers of God have
emphasized him, but institutional prayer and the wont of the generality has
been in placing the ego-self first. When the ego-self is placed first it is
rather difficult to become wise, and tolerant, and considerate, and polite.
When God is placed first it is easy and natural. The aim here is to purify the
heart. In the end one comes to Mujahida, the great Jihad, or the purification
of the heart from every form of selfishness. The last period of the life of
Mohammed was almost entirely directed so. And when it is properly perceived
that after vanquishing all his external enemies his efforts were directed
toward overcoming his own weakness, the world will have both an ideal and
exemplary which will be of universal benefit.”
This commentary addresses the
issue of true form of prayer and again of the importance of Tawwab, repentance,
purification of the heart or turning away from the ego-self first, to be more
than just asking for forgiveness of sins. The notion of the meaning of ġaffār, to recover or to
conceal, happens naturally when there is repentance since there is
transmutation to another state of consciousness. The devotee having entered the
presence of God, through His love (Wadud)
experiences His forgiveness (ġaffār).
On the Performance of Zikar by Murshid
Samuel L. Lewis20 (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti), he says that the prayer
means: “O Lord Who is worshipped in the unseen
worlds on high, may Thou also be worshipped in the world below. Grant us Thy
sustenance and forgive us our shortcomings as the spirit of forgiveness and
forbearance appears in us. May our love for Thee be so great that we shall be
delivered from all the temptations and trials of this world.”
In the Commentary on Sangatha
TASSAWUF: METAPHYSICS, Series 2 of Pir-o-Murshid Hazrat Inayat Khan by
Murshid Samuel L. Lewis12,
on the subject of forgiveness:
“TOWARD
THE ONE, THE PERFECTION OF LOVE, HARMONY AND BEAUTY, THE ONLY BEING; UNITED
WITH ALL THE ILLUMINATED SOULS WHO FORM THE EMBODIMENT OF THE MASTER, THE
SPIRIT OF GUIDANCE. FORGIVENESS
GATHA:
They say “Forgive and forget”, which is very expressive of the process of
forgiveness. It is impossible to forgive unless you can forget.
TASSAWUF:
Forgiving by itself is an egocentric activity. The teachings are that one
cannot offer forgiveness by oneself. He can do so only when asked by another.
There are self-proud people who say that they forgive but if they remember the
incident or the person they are not forgiving actually. Only when episodes are
entirely removed from the mind can forgiveness be automatic and then no
negative samskaras remain in the mind. The danger is not in receiving or not
receiving a grievance; the danger is in the unconscious assumption of the
ego-self. Every grievance either produces or assumes a duality, and
separateness. We may repeat “Toward the One” and “United with All”, but until
this reaches deep into our consciousness, separateness remains. When it is
surmounted there is no longer scope for offenses, grievances, pains and so for
forgiveness.
GATHA:
What keeps man from forgiving his fellow-man is that he holds the fault of
another constantly before his view. It is just like sticking a little thorn in
one’s own heart and keeping it there and suffering the pain. It may also be
pictured as putting a drop of poison in one’s own heart and keeping it there until
the whole heart becomes poisoned.
TASSAWUF:
The veil of nafs tends to hold the faults of others before the view. It throws
a shadow on sight and Insight alike. Then the faults of others seem realities
and whatever virtues they have may seem unimportant. This is exactly the
opposite as with the wise. The wise may reach a state where differences and
distinctions vanish; where faults and virtues are of no special accord. They
see the unlimited possibilities of unity and brotherhood and the relative unimportance
of short-comings, that these will inevitably pass away because all people have
in them the seeds of perfection, of perfectibility. All ill-will, envy,
jealousy and such negative emotions and attitudes are poisons and not only in
the symbolical sense but actually. When we hold on to one of them we produce
poisons in our body, in our system. That is the source of many virulent
diseases. The free heart is the best prophylactic against discomfort and
disease.
GATHA:
Verily, blessed are the innocent, who do not notice anybody’s fault, and the
greater credit is to the mature souls who, recognizing a fault, forget it and
so forgive.
TASSAWUF:
We can refer here to the life of Rabia, the great Sufi lady saint of
GATHA:
How true are the words of Christ, “Let those throw a stone who have not
sinned.” The limitations of human life make man subject to faults; some have
more faults, some have less, but there is no soul without faults. As Christ
says, “Call me not good.”
TASSAWUF:
Call not the ego (me) good. Goodness and ego do not go together. Goodness
belongs to God (Allah) along with all other attributes of perfection. To find
goodness we must get away from ego. The Islamic prayer “Praise be to Allah”
suggests that all praise belongs to Allah. Mankind has assumed not only the
arrogance to judge and condemn others, but also to praise and both of these are
contrary to holy writ and both accord with the habits of ego (nafs). The
statement, “There is no soul without faults” really means there is no ego
without faults. The soul itself is pure and unstained, a point on which many
scriptures agree. And this is also the standpoint of the Prajna Paramita Sutras
of the Mahayana Buddhists.
GATHA: Forgiveness is a stream of love which washes
away all impurities wherever it flows.
TASSAWUF:
The principle of the stream-of-love is basic to Sufism. It is fundamental to
the principle of God as the Perfection of Love, Harmony and Beauty. It is the
operation of Life in action. Life in action not only produces Love, it is love
itself.
GATHA:
By keeping this spring of love, which is in the heart of man running, man is
able to forgive, however great the fault of his fellow-man may seem. One who
cannot forgive closes his heart.
TASSAWUF:
There is a concentration on Heart and it may be either in the form of looking
at a picture or symbol of Heart or it may be by identifying oneself with the
innermost recesses of one’s heart or by combining them. When this takes place
there is outbreak of Light and Baraka. When there is this outbreak there is a
transformation of personality and character. One feels full of RAHMAT, which is
to say both Compassion and Mercy, Rahman and Rahim. We may say here that Ilm,
the true knowledge, leads to Ishk, selfless love. But it is also true that Ishk
leads to Ilm. As Rabia, the lady saint, said, “In the presence of Allah there
is no sense of pleasure or pain, of rebuke or rejoicing.” And when the
Heart-love streams forth, as is declared in the principles of Sufism, ancient
and modern, one will naturally forgive, one will be unable to receive insults
as insults.
GATHA: The sign of spirituality is that there is
nothing you cannot forgive, there is no fault you cannot forget.
TASSAWUF:
For when nafs is no longer dominant, there is no focus to receive praise or
blame personally. There is no sense of being other than Allah and as Allah has
created everyone, one cannot blame the creations of the creator. No doubt there
are persons at many states and stages of evolution. But this very knowledge
makes one feel compassion to all the race.
GATHA:
Do not think that he who has committed a fault yesterday must do the same
today, for life is constantly teaching and it is possible in one moment a
sinner may turn into a saint.
TASSAWUF:
Buddha taught incessant change and it is well to accept such a view. Indeed
modern scientists are coming to the same view. For the soul is full of light
and the heart of compassion. Every experience tends to unshackle the veils,
although pain, distress and opposition do this much more quickly than pleasure
and self-satisfaction. We are changed by every experience.
GATHA:
At times it is hard to forgive, as it is hard to take away the thorn that has
gone deep into one’s heart. But the pain that one feels in taking away the
thorn deep-set in the heart is preferable to keeping the thorn in the heart constantly.
TASSAWUF:
So long as one feels pleasure and pain, elation or depression, this shows the
dominance of nafs. When one performs the Heart-concentration as above; or when
one learns to live in the Heart-vibrations, the tendency toward elation or depression
will weaken. One will achieve a kind of bravery (not bravado) to stand up
against all vicissitudes of life and [ex-]/[accept?] them naturally, as
belonging to life. Then one can hold no ill-will against anybody in particular.
But suppose someone harms you, or makes it a point to harm others? That is the
time to test one’s faith and even one’s own spirituality. For all such persons
are subject to karma, they fall, at best, under the Law of Reciprocity. Evil
never dominates for long; it is subject to time-processes and the
wheel-of-the-law.
GATHA:
The greater pain of a moment is better than the mild pricking going on
constantly. Ask him who forgives what relief there is in forgiveness.
TASSAWUF:
For this is a lightening of one’s own tensions and depressions. The lightening
of tension and depression frees one from illness; the retention thereof is a
cause of many sicknesses. Besides if one practices Akhlak Allah, the Presence
of God; or learns to inhale and exhale the light breath (opposite of heavy), the
whole personality will feel a freedom and relief.
GATHA:
Words can never explain the feeling of the heart when one has cast out the
bitter feeling from one’s heart by forgiving and when love spreads all over
within oneself, circulating like warm blood through one’s whole being.
TASSAWUF:
Thought of wrong keeps the heart spotted; even the attitude of the existence of
“right” and “wrong” is not very helpful in promoting understanding. And feeling
itself tends to keep alive the sense-of-self and to limit the feeling of the
Divine Presence. There is a story of Mohammed purging himself or being purged
of a drop of blood which is in “The Unity of Religious Ideals.” This was to
give the example that all of us may go through a similar process; Mohammed
never arrogated specialities for and to himself and constantly said he was like
everyone else. So we can all purge ourselves of the poison in the heart. Then
we have the warm blood circulating through our veins; then we have the Love
(Ishk) penetrating our personality.
For members of the
He who repeats this Name ("YA-GHAFFAR") will be forgiven his sins. "Al-Ghaffar" is the One Who has manifested what is beautiful and veiled what is ugly in the life of this world and Who does not inflict penalty on him in the life hereafter. He is the One Who forgives sins, veils the shortcomings, wipes out the sins by accepting one's repentance. He is the One Who Forgives the sins though they may be great, and He veils them though they may be numerous. To emulate the name we are advised to try to see the good in people and to overlook their evil traits, and to be endowed with the spirit of forgiveness20.
Al-Ghazali21 refers
to the importance of concealment pointing out how the outward body conceals the
disgusting inner parts. How the thoughts of man so frequently wicked or
mischievous are kept hidden within man's heart. How after death the believer
has his sins changed into good deeds or covered by the merits of his good
deeds. He tells the story of Lord Jesus who with his disciples was passing the
carcass of a dead dog. The disciples commented on its foulness while Jesus
merely said: “What beautiful white teeth he has”, thus implying that what
should be mentioned about a thing is what is best in it.
( Koran 2, 235)2 ...Wa'-lamuuu 'annal-laaha ya' amu maa fiii 'anfusikum fah-zaruuh;
wa'- lamuuu 'annallaaha Ghafuurun Haliim. “And know that Allah knows
what is in your minds, so beware of Him; and know that Allah is Forgiving,
Forbearing.”
Ar-Râzî 4 presents the expressions
derived from the name forgive maġfira:
A. Qualities of Allah expressing forgiveness:
1.
al-Ghâfir: the
forgiver of sins (Koran 11:3) “And ask forgiveness of your Lord, then turn to
Him.”
2.
al-Ghafűr: (Koran
3.
al-Ghaffâr (Koran 71:10) “So I have said: Ask forgiveness of your
Lord; surely He is ever Forgiving:”
The above examples show that these three names come
from maġfira, the forgiveness of
Allah.
B. Corresponding to these names are the qualities of
sinfulness from the faithful.
a.
al-Zhâlim: the
unjust (Koran 35:32) “Then We have given the Book as inheritance to those whom
We have chosen from among Our servants: so of them is he who wrongs himself,
and of them is he who takes a middle course, and of them is he who is foremost
in deeds of goodness by Allah’s permission. That is the great grace.”
b.
al-Zhalűm: the
very unjust (Koran 33:72) “Surely he is ever unjust, ignorant.”
c.
al-Zhallâm: the
one who does not stop being unjust (Koran 39:53) “Say: O My servants who have
been prodigal regarding their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allah; surely
Allah forgives sins altogether. He is indeed the Forgiving, the Merciful.” (Dis! O mes serviteurs qui ont été excessifs
envers leur âmes…). The one who has been prodigal or excessif (asrafa) in
his disobedience is one who is always unjust.
C. Correspondence of these three couple of names:
a.
If you are unjust
(Zhâlim) , Allah is forgiving (Ghâfir)
b.
If you are very
unjust (Zhalűm), Allah is very forgiving (Ghafűr)
c.
If you are always
unjust (Zhallâm), Allah is always forgiving (Ghaffâr)
(Koran
15:56) Do not be of those who despair because: “He said: And who despairs of
the mercy of his Lord but the erring ones?”
D. Forms of forgiveness
a.
(Koran 38:24
& 25) This verses about the past shows that those who ask forgiveness and
come back to Allah receive forgiveness. “so he asked his Lord for protection,
and he fell down bowing and turned to God.” And “So We gave him this
protection, …”
b.
This verse about
the future (Koran 4, 116) “and He forgives all besides this to whom He
pleases.” And (Koran 39:53) “Say: O My servants who have been prodigal
regarding their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allah; surely Allah forgives
sins altogether. He is indeed the Forgiving, the Merciful.”
c.
Some verses have
an order to teach the faithful (Koran 2, 286): “And pardon us! And grant us
protection! And have mercy on us!”
d.
Finally in other
verses, the verbal name (maçdar): the
act of forgiving, (ghufrân) the
forgiveness that shows up (Koran 2, 285): “our Lord, Thy forgiveness (do we
crave), and to Thee is the eventual course.” And (Koran 13, 6): “And surely thy
Lord is full of forgiveness for mankind notwithstanding their iniquity.”
Ar-Râzî 4 discussed the subtleties contained in the Koran about forgiveness as follows:
(Koran
40, 1 to 3) “Beneficent God!, The revelation of the Book is from Allah, the
Mighty, the Knowing. Forgiver of sin and Acceptor of repentance, Severe to
punish, Lord of bounty. There is no God but He; to Him is the eventual coming.”
1.
The one who
forgives the sin of the sinner and accept repentance of those who come back
2.
He forgives sin
by compassion. He accepts repentance.
3.
The one who
forgives the sin of the unjust and accept repentance of the one that come back
towards the goal.
4.
Abű Bakr
al-Wasitî said “the one who forgives the sin of those who say “lâ ilâha illâ-llâh” and who is intense
in the punishment of those that refuse the reality of lâ ilâha illâ-llâh.
Allah
mentioned four of His Qualities in this verse, three about the Faithful and one
about the unfaithful. The forgiveness, the acceptance of repentance, the Lord
of bounty are applied to the faithful, the severity of punish to the
unfaithful. There is wisdom in enouncing three qualities for the faithful
corresponding to (Koran 35, 32) “Then We have given the Book as inheritance to
those whom We have chosen from among Our servants: so of them is he who wrongs
himself, and of them is he who takes a middle course, and of them is he who is
foremost in deeds of goodness by Allah’s permission. That is the great grace.”
The unfaithful represents one kind (Koran 10, 32): “Such then is Allah, your
true Lord. And what is there after the truth but error?”
Allah
told his messenger to behave in the best manner towards the poor:
(Koran
6, 52) “And drive not away those who call upon their Lord, morning and evening,
desiring only His pleasure.
(Koran
18, 28) :”And keep thyself with those who call on their Lord morning and
evening desiring His goodwill, and let not thine eyes pass from them, desiring
the beauties of this world’s life.”
(Koran
71, 10) “So I have said: Ask forgiveness of your Lord; surely He is ever
Forgiving” (innahu kâna ghaffâran).
But Allah does not say “is” ever Forgiving (innahu
ghaffârun) but is (kâna) ever Forgiving from before eternity, the world of
the soul, the beginning (awwal) to the world of form, the world
of creations, this world (dunyā)
to the world of hereafter, the world of resplendent light, the world of
complete perfection, the kingdom of God (ākhir) qualified by the Fonction of the One Who does
not stop from forgiving (ghaffâriyya).
So do not be surprise that Allah forgives your sins.
(Koran 15, 49) “Inform My servants that I am the Forgiving, the Merciful.” (nabi ‘idâdî annî annâ-l-ghafűru-r-rahîmu)
Ar-Râzî 4 in his saying from the masters on this three divines names derived of forgiveness quoted this:
The
Forgiver who possess the science of certitude (ilm al yaqin), the very Forgiver who has the eye of certitude (ain al yaqin) and the one who does not
stop from forgiving who has the truth of certitude (haqq al yaqin).
In the Sangatha, Hazrat Inayat Khan clarified forgiveness as a practice18:
“The
fifth characteristic of the Sufi is to practice forgiveness, showing thereby
the Divine Spirit reflected in his heart. Forgiveness can be practiced in
different ways. In all such things as tolerance, forgetting, overlooking,
forgiveness acts in different forms. The Sufi need not speak about these five
principles, but practice them. The Sufi does not profess to have these five
characteristics, but he tries to practice these principles, which enables him
to tread the path with less difficulty and with ease.
Does
God not always forgive? (Note: The meaning of this question was affirmative and
not negative: “Does God not always forgive?”)
A.
Yes, but by asking consciously God’s forgiveness, God’s forgiveness comes in
our consciousness. God has forgiven already, but by asking God’s forgiveness it
reflects in our consciousness, also in the consciousness of the one whom we
wish that would forgive us. In the East there is, the Prophet Mohammed told his
followers that, “No matter how much good you have done, but if your parents
remain dissatisfied with you, you are not forgiven.” And what is the meaning of
this? The meaning is this, that God always forgives, and who does not forgive
is man; and that parents, we owe to them, to the parents, a great deal, the
most, I mean. And only by asking their forgiveness can that debt be paid. But
not paying it back; because we can never pay them back. In the same light we
can see this idea with every person. It is easy for us to forgive another, but
it is difficult to get the forgiveness from another, because we can forgive
another person if we want to. But another person will not forgive us if we want
to. And therefore, to forgive is easy, and to get forgiveness of another is
most difficult. And God’s forgiveness is always there, but man’s forgiveness
must be obtained. That can be obtained by making our consciousness saturated
with God’s forgiveness. That, reflecting in the person who has not forgiven, it
will come to us.
And
if a person is clear of vision he will feel it; just like one feels cold or
heat he will feel the forgiveness of another person. And it is so easy to
offend, and it is difficult to make up. In just a least little thing we can
offend another without knowing it, and to make up it is so difficult. It is
just like lifting a mountain. You can ask and ask and you can do and do what
you like, what you can, and may not be forgiven. Because many people are unable
to forgive. They cannot forgive. They are not capable of forgiving. They cannot
forgive because they cannot forget. The first step in forgiving is to forget.
And not everybody is capable of forgetting. It is an impression which can be
deeply rooted in a person. They never can forget. Even if a person wanted to
forget he cannot forget. And if one cannot forget, then one cannot forgive. If
a person says, “Oh yes, I forgive you,” that is not enough. He must first
forget. Then only, he can forgive. And the one who has got the key to get the
forgiveness of another, that is the man who conquers the world.”
What
is most wonderful in the study of the Arabic word ġaffār is the
realization that the root of the word was built to indicate the association of
forgiveness with the notion of concealment or forgetting, such as in the
sayings of Hazrat Inayat Khan that was mentioned for the Bowl of Saki7
where he said that the first step in forgiveness is to forget. It is also wondrous
to realize the relationship among the beautiful names of Allah such as in ġāfir,
ġafūr and ġaffār, and also with waddud, tawwab, halim and
‘afuww and many others. It is said that when one knows the 99 beautiful names
of God that he may enter paradise. In a way, the 99 beautiful names are like a
roadmap for the initiate to follow in order to get closer to its goal of unity
in the presence of God. One is reminded of the melting pot of the alchemist,
all the qualities being interrelated must be mixed in the pot with great care
in order to produce the right recipe. This is a dynamic process starting with
love, repentance and tolerance for the student on the path of Sufism. However,
one must not forget the fire under the pot. It is not enough to know about the
fire (Ilm al Yaqin or knowledge of certitude, associated with ġāfir),
to see the fire with our own eyes (Ain al Yaqin or the eye of certitude,
associated with ġafūr) but to become one with the fire (Haqq al Yaqin
or the truth of certitude, associated with ġaffār). The transmutation
of consciousness bring a whole new way to perceive the true meaning of the word
ġaffār, when the heart is purified, then one becomes forgiveness.
Most
Merciful and Compassionate God,
Give us Thy great Goodness;
Teach us Thy loving Forgiveness;
(Khatum, Hazrat Inayat Khan)
All-powerful
Creator, Sustainer,
Judge and Forgiver
Of our shortcomings,
(Saum, Hazrat Inayat Khan)
-----------
1.
Asma’ul Husna, the 99
Beautiful Names of Allah, M.R. Bawa Muhaiyaddeen
2. The Holy Quor’ān, Arabic Text with English Translation and
Commentary by Maulana Muhammad Ali, New 2002 edition, Ahmadiyya Anjuman Isha’at
Islam Lahore Inc. USA, Ohio, USA.
3. See: Les
noms divins en Islam, Daniel Gimaret, exégčse lexicographique et théologique,
1988, Editions du cerf. Page 425-6.
4. Ar-Râzî, traité sur les noms divins, by Maurice Gloton,
Editions Al Bouraq.
5. Bowl of Saki for September 11 by Hazrat Inayat Khan,
Commentary by Hazrat Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
6. Bowl of Saki by Hazrat Inayat Khan, Commentary
by Hazrat Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
7. Bowl of Saki for September 12 by Hazrat Inayat Khan, Commentary
by Hazrat Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
8. GATHEKAS FOR CANDIDATES by Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan
9. Githas of Hazrat Inayat Khan on
CONCENTRATION
10. Commentary on Sangatha TAKUA TAHARAT: EVERYDAY LIFE Series 3 of
Pir-o-Murshid Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi
Ahmed Murad Chisti)
11. Commentary on Sangatha KASHF: INSIGHT Series 3 of Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
12. Commentary on Sangatha TASSAWUF: METAPHYSICS Series 2 of Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid
Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
13. Commentary on Sangatha SALUK: MORALS Series 2 of Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
14. Commentary on Sangatha SALUK: MORALS Series I of Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
15. COMMENTARY ON “THE INNER LIFE” OF HAZRAT INAYAT KHAN BY MURSHID
SAMUEL L. LEWIS SUFI AHMED MURAD CHISTI
16. “GAYANIAT” Commentaries on THE GAYAN: Notes from the Unstruck
Music of HAZRAT INAYAT KHAN by Murshid Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad
Chisti)
17. Commentary on Mental Purification of Hazrat Inayat Khan by Murshid
Samuel L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
18. SANGATHA Series 2 of Pir-o-Murshid
Hazrat Inayat Khan
19. On the Performance of Zikar by Murshid Samuel
L. Lewis (Sufi Ahmed Murad Chisti)
20. 'The 99 Most Beautiful Names of Allah'
by Dr Zahurul Hassan Sharib
21. Al-Ghazali - The Ninety-nine Beautiful Names
of God. Trans. Burrel/Daher: ITS: 1992.
--------------------